Redux is hugely widespread as the architecture for React and React-Native projects. Its decoupled nature combined with immutability ensures a truly functional application, when used correctly. Yes, that’s all true.
Redux starts to sound weird when we try to figure out where actions may be used. Specially when your project has wrappers and HOCs, which might mean actions definitions may not be where they’re actually used.
An iOS Analogy
An application that uses Redux is like an iOS app whose architecture is heavily based on
NSNotifications: someone you don’t know who might be posting notifications that
may be listened by other unknown parties. At any moment a new entity might start listening to posted
notifications and might also start posting them. To be honest, it’s too decoupled for my taste, if
that’s even possible at all.
It is beautiful in theory. However, for real world applications I haven’t seen a project where I didn’t struggle to find dispatchers or listeners at some point.
It’s worse for React-Native
This means that each Redux action that is dispatched is listened by every single reducer in a single thread of your application. Competing with other JS code like your components or data processing. Yes, you might not think so, but your app does data processing: think about your selectors or chewing data from your API.
That’s not pretty. Or performant. You have to be very mindful of which actions you’re dispatching and where you listen to them. Remember that multiple reducers might read a single action.
It gets worse if you’re using Redux-sagas
Redux-saga is a middleware for Redux that, poorly speaking, allow an action to trigger a function instead of mutating your global state. A saga might also have a side-effect that dispatches new actions.
Think about that.
An action that dispatches new actions.
If that’s not the definition of a nightmare, I don’t know what is.
Don’t get me wrong, Redux and Redux-sagas are beautiful and may be good solutions for web development, they just don’t work for mobile applications. You may be thinking that they do work because there are multiple cases in the market, but then you’re missing the concept of “work”: it’s not just a matter of being possible and execution. It’s also scaling. Redux does not scale.
I’ve seen applications with over 120 reducers and over 150 routes. Can you imagine how the dispatch log looks for an app that size? Do you think it’s performant? Does the application lag?
I’ll leave it to you to induce those answers.
I’m yet to find a performant architecture to write function applications in React-Native. If we find a way to instantiate multiple JS VMs and have them communicating; or if Apple releases a multi-threaded VM. Both solutions would vastly improve the performance of React-Native apps overall, whether or not they’re using Redux.
In the current state of the art, the best alternative is to keep writing imperative applications for React-Native projects. Research an architecture that best suits your application and go with it.